Re: [TruthTalk] Antinomianism Refuted

[Judy Taylor]

If you have evidence that I have judged any of you personally on this public forum; please produce it publicly.  Thank you.  jt   On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 12:31:09 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: The same 'who' that set up you, Iz, David & Kevin. That's WHO! From: Judy Taylor   From my vantage point - DavidM understands and you don't. Whether or not Jesus had a fallen Adamic nature is the only issue I am aware of that we disagree about.   As to braggadocious ... Your group are the only ones accusing him and this is mild compared to some other accusations I have read from you ppl....  Who set you and your cronies up to evaluate another man's servant?      On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 12:13:46 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Nice word, braggadocious, David. Once again, you fail to note that it > and, a > variety of synomyms have been used to describe YOU. In the face of > this  yet > do you come back at those who so identify you with anecdotes > illustrating > your humility. > > The citation of names has naught to do with popularity, David. It > could but, > it needn't. Do you not see that? I actually know some of these > people and > I'd take their evaluation of Judy over yours any day. (I still, > FWIW, see > you as a person who doesn't know himself all that well.) > > Explain please: 'I do not..claim..understanding' against 'I observe > that you > guys fail to understand' (meaning YOU DO UNDERSTAND) Which is it? > You do & > we don't? You don't & we don't? (maybe nobody but God does) > >  Original Message ----- > From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org> > Sent: October 10, 2005 12:02 > Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Antinomianism Refuted > > > > Lance wrote: > >> As I believe that Debbie, Caroline, Jonathan, > >> Bill, Gary and,  JD (I'll leave myself out) have > >> ALL understood Judy then, I cannot but believe that > >> it is YOU who don't. So much for speaking infallibly. > > > > Truth is not determined by a popularity contest.  This assumption > has > > proved > > to be one of the most serious errors in the way you think.  > Nevertheless, > > I > > do not make any special claims to understanding Judy.  I have just > > > observed > > time and time again where you guys fail to understand her points. > > > > By the way, why are some of you so braggadocious on the list?  > After > > awhile > > it appears quite unbecoming, especially for a Christian. > > > > Peace be with you. > > David Miller. > > > > ---------- > > "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that > you may > > know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) > > http://www.InnGlory.org > > > > If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email > to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you > have a > > friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. > > > > > ---------- > "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you > may know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) > http://www.InnGlory.org > > If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you > have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. > >