Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter

[Taylor]

Not unique today perhaps (you would have to ask David M.) -- but very much so two thousand years ago.   Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: Dave To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2005 5:17 PM Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter DAVEH:   At the risk of stirring the dieing ashes, I'm now wondering what you folks think about artificial insemination.  Can a virgin be artificially inseminated and have a virgin birth?  If so, then a virgin birth may not be such a unique event.     BTW......I'm not trying to stir up more controversy....I'm merely curious.  These discussions have certainly got me thinking out of the box..... C. Perry writes  >  Bill, what constitutes a loss of virginity, "knowing" a man, or having a baby? I surmise the former. (Since this is a one-time event, we certainly have no precedence!) Perry, I certainly agree with you concerning the lack of precedence. Mary conceived without having "known" a man. She was a virgin; something happened to her, which had never happened before.   -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain six email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.