|
cd; What do you mean(though not necessarily
sexual)? DAVEH: What I meant is that I do not know specifically how it was accomplished other than by the power of the HG, but I do think it can be accomplished via means that are not sexual in the physical sense that you are insisting it be. For instance, today artificial insemination is a very common and popular method of impregnating cattle that have never been in physical contact. As I see it, if cattle can reproduce in a natural fashion (in other words.....not needing miraculous, supernatural or black magic activity) without physically sexual contact, I don't know why you think the Lord could not do what needed to be done to alter Mary's genetic code (I know that is a bit too simplified.....or whatever needed doing to allow her to conceive as a virgin) without having a sexual experience with her. This is very simple, Dean, and I don't know why you cannot understand what I am telling you. FTR once again: I do not believe God had physical sex with Mary. Nor does LDS theology teach such. Dean Moore wrote:
-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain six email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS. |
- Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter Dave
- Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the mat... Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the mat... Kevin Deegan

