Did you have a comment concerning the demonstrable use of the words/concepts "FAther" and "Son" as applied to the God the Old Testament. You seem to ignore this fact as you try to move away from the subject of this thread.
Secondly, how do you understand the word "presentation?" Do you actually see a contraction in this post? Do you not understand what I believe?
Jd
-----Original Message-----
From: Judy Taylor <jandgtaylor1@juno.com>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 18:52:38 -0400
Subject: [TruthTalk] Back to the Garden
From: Judy Taylor <jandgtaylor1@juno.com>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 18:52:38 -0400
Subject: [TruthTalk] Back to the Garden
But I thought you told me he was an "eternal Son" JD. How so? since both Father and Son are a uniquely New Covenant presentation IYO?
By the way, Judy, T. I may have left off an important fact. A few days ago,
I mentioned that "Father" was a NT presentation and you responded with a seeming
correction, pointing to all those scriptures in Strong's with the word "father."
If I did not make it clear,, I am doing so here - of the several hundred OLD TESTAMENT
scriptures with the word "father," only two of them apply to God and neither has in mind
the New Covenant usage. Father God is an uniquely New Covenant presentation, as is
the Son of God .
JD
