As I said, the term Mistake is a euphemism for Sin. One can
make a mistake and it is not a sin. Calling one's sins a mistake is one
way of making them look less offensive and selfish. Lefties prefer
the term. iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 9:30 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] [Fwd: Telegraph News Prince Charles to plead Islam's cause to Bush]
I am not sure I see the point. "Sin" is a translation
of a Greek word. "Sin" is a wrong choice or a
mistake, is it not?
Just for the record -- I was not calling Charles an
"idiot." I was trying to figure out who the "idiot" was in the post
in question. But, I must admit, if it had to be him or
me, I am glad it was him !!!
JD
-----Original Message-----
From: ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 06:56:13 -0600
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] [Fwd: Telegraph News Prince Charles to plead Islam's cause to Bush]
Ever notice that
instead of using the word "Sin" today, the politically correct term is "mistake"
or "wrong choices"? iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Terry
Clifton
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 6:43 AM
To:[email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] [Fwd: Telegraph News Prince Charles to plead Islam's cause to Bush]
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 6:43 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] [Fwd: Telegraph News Prince Charles to plead Islam's cause to Bush]
Bingo! You got it. You are not the
idiot. Prince Charles is. He seems to have an uncanny ability to
make the wrong choices.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who is the "prince" and who is
calling me an idiot? I am not following. The correct
response to the story I posted is something along the lines of "Geee, that's too bad for these
girls." how can there be any controversy over this
story? The URL addresses listed below give no information. Aaaahhh -- wait a
minute. Your subject line -- does that have anything to
do with the url
addresses? The idiot is Prince Charles ??!!!
Amazing -- I got all that from the subject line, if
correct. Am I on the right track, here.
The sad thing about Islam is
this -- perhaps 60 % of them {world wide] are
non-violent but I would bet that nearly 100% would side with the
killers if push came to shove. Their holy men and congregations have
done virtually nothing to counter that claim since years before
9-11. Whether motivated by fear of their own people or not, I
could not care less. All that is necessary for evil to triumph is
............. a statement that most certainly applies to the
"peaceful" among the Muslims.
Have you forgotten, the day
the towers fell,
friends were there, going through
a living hell.
John
-----Original Message-----
From: Terry Clifton <wabbits1234@earthlink.net>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 22:15:50 -0500
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] [Fwd: Telegraph News Prince Charles to plead Islam's cause to Bush]
You posted a story about three
school girls beheaded by muslims. Now the prince wants
us to know that they are not really bad people.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does this
mean?
JD
-----Original Message-----
From: Terry Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 19:29:45 -0500
Subject: [TruthTalk] [Fwd: Telegraph News Prince Charles to plead Islam's cause to Bush]
Get out you story about the girls being murdered and sent it to this idiot, John
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/10/30/nchas30.xml&sSheet=/portal/2005/10/30/ixportaltop.html
