[TruthTalk] Nothing Would Prevail

[Dave]

Christ's claim that nothing would prevail against His church. DAVEH:   I am very curious as to what you mean by that, Dean.  Would you please quote the passage and explain how you understand it.     I would also like to know what you think JS said that contradicted the above. Dean Moore wrote:       ----- Original Message ----- From: Dave To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: 11/12/2005 2:07:26 PM Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Intent of the Law Dave if you believe in Christ why do you follow J. Smith they are not in agreement. DAVEH:  I do not believe they are in disagreement, Dean. cd: Then how can you explain Smith's claim to be the only one to hold a church together and Christ's claim that nothing would prevail against His church.Two differant claim that are opposed Dave. Dean Moore wrote: DAVEH:   FTR........So that there is no mistake or misunderstanding, I declare that Jesus Christ is my Savior. cd: With the exception of DaveH cd: I don't think my first reply got sent-so I will try again. Dave if you believe in Christ why do you follow J. Smith they are not in agreement. Are you caught between two beliefs. Renounce the Mormonism and come on over and enjoy true fellowship with us-you are the only one whom can remove the sword-not us. Dean Moore wrote: We need a SAVIOR!   cd: With the exception of DaveH-We already have a savior.So what Law are you breaking if all are Lawbreakers? I won't tell your wife or anybody:-) You are also at liberty to tell me which Law I am breaking. Isaiah 53 Show my people their transgressions... -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain six email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.