I can dig up the reference for this statement  -- but who in the world thinks this is some kind of problem?  I mentioned his several editions  -  so the 22 weeks was certainly not talking about all of this body of work.   Actually,   i am not going to look for the reference  --  it just doesn't make any difference.  So key on this issue and ignore all that was said, textually, in my posts.   Nice move. 
 
Jd 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Deegan <openairmission@yahoo.com>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 19:07:43 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] corrector/revisor

SOMEBODY MADE UP THE "22 WEEKS"
 
In this case Facts are NOT Stranger than Fiction!


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
22 out of 110 weeks for the NT, by whose hand?
 
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:42:43 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
 
1509-14, Erasmus began the great work of his life,  [:] an edition of the New Testament and of the Letters of Jerome.
 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
all that matters..is this a lie?
 
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 09:22:37 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Erasmus used a text..
||

Reply via email to