I can dig up the reference for this statement -- but who in the world thinks this is some kind of problem? I mentioned his several editions - so the 22 weeks was certainly not talking about all of this body of work. Actually, i am not going to look for the reference -- it just doesn't make any difference. So key on this issue and ignore all that was said, textually, in my posts. Nice move.
Jd
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Deegan <openairmission@yahoo.com>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 19:07:43 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] corrector/revisor
SOMEBODY MADE UP THE "22 WEEKS"
In this case Facts are NOT Stranger than Fiction!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
22 out of 110 weeks for the NT, by whose hand?On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:42:43 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:1509-14, Erasmus began the great work of his life, [:] an edition of the New Testament and of the Letters of Jerome.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:all that matters..is this a lie?On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 09:22:37 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:Erasmus used a text..||
- Re: [TruthTalk] corrector/revisor knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] corrector/revisor Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] corrector/revisor Dave Hansen
- Re: [TruthTalk] corrector/revisor Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] corrector/revisor Dave Hansen
- Re: [TruthTalk] corrector/revisor Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] corrector/revisor knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] corrector/revisor Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] corrector/revisor Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] corrector/revisor knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] corrector/revisor ttxpress

