could be !!!
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 19:54:24 -0700
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] corrector/revisor
yes; note/correction, ff.:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 01:53:50 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I can dig up the reference for this statement -- but who in the world thinks this is some kind of problem? ..the 22 [apparently/actually out of 510 wks, over a 5 yr period] weeks was certainly not talking about all of this body of work...
||
