Re: [TruthTalk] A question for our resident scholar

[ttxpress]

non-thinkers are teachable?   On Sun, 20 Nov 2005 09:00:12 -0600 "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Just be careful who you allow to “teach” you!   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 8:56 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] A question for our resident scholar   IFF 'it means what it says' meant what Iz, Judy et al thought then, there would be no need for  teachers. A word to the wise 'THERE IS A NEED FOR TEACHERS'! ----- Original Message ----- From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: November 20, 2005 09:45 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] A question for our resident scholar   That’s okay, Terry.  JD thinks anyone who has a different viewpoint is not “serious”, thinks they have “all the answers”, and is suffering from “sheer ignorance.”  We expect that by now, don’t we? iz   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry Clifton Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 10:43 PM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] A question for our resident scholar   You asked a serious question.  Izzy gave you a serious answer.  I am one of those "some believers" that she mentioned. Terry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nothing to ponder   and I mean "nothing to ponder."    Another one liner by Shields that avoids any serious discussion and allows her to believe that she has all the answers.    Who believe that it is NOT "in line with the rest of scripture"  (whatever that means.)   I was asking a very serious question.   it is sheer ignorance that answers with "it means what it says" or some derivative thereof.    JD    News flash: Some Believers really consider the Sermon on the Mount to be both reasonable and perfectly in line with the rest of scripture.  (Ponder that.)  iz