How do these words ( of Christ -- Matt 5-7 ) relate to any discussion of law and grace? "
-----Original Message-----
From: ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 14:30:40 -0600
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Forgiveness
I ascribed no "motives" whatsoever to you. What motives do you think I commented on????? iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 2:22 PM
To:[email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Forgiveness
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 2:22 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Forgiveness
Is there some reason why you find it necessary to comment on my motives as opposed to actually answering the question that I so plainly asked, to wit: How do these words ( of Christ ) relate to any discussion of law and grace? " ? The sermon is full of "rules" that none of us obey." So just answer my question. My motives are of no concern to you and are , truly, fully unknown to you.
How do these words ( of Christ ) relate to any discussion of law and grace? "
JD
-----Original Message-----
From: ShieldsFamily <
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 10:10:25 -0600
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Forgiveness
It was mine, as JD wrote: "we have Christ presenting a prayer that is nowhere repeated in scripture;.we have a "correction " of the Mosaic law on divorce; we have new definition on hate and murder; we have His amendment on "an eye for eye" ---- a part of the Mosaic law; How do these words ( of Christ ) relate to any discussion of law and g race? " They do not seem incongruent to me, but seem to be so to JD. What say ye, JD? iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Taylor
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 9:26 AM
To:[email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Forgiveness
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 9:26 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Forgiveness
Verifying my statement that the Sermon on the Mount is NOT out of alignment with the rest of scripture as JD claims. iz
It was not my impression that John thought this. Bill
