RE: [TruthTalk] Another darn Questionere!

[ShieldsFamily]

Kevin, are you the guy doing the preaching, or the guy in the polkadot baseball cap, or the guy with no hat on? iz   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 10:06 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Another darn Questionere!   I'm in the house to get some coffee and off to the shop  --  but,  who is Dean in the video?   The  guy with the hat, who looks like he has  a wad of chew?   Nothing wrong with that, by the way.    Apparently most believing perichoresis types also chew !!  But is that Dean?    JD    Bye for now.      -----Original Message----- From: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 21:58:11 -0800 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Another darn Questionere! DAVEH:  Thank you for sharing that, Kevin.  After watching Dean preach, I do not understand why he claims not to protest Mormonism.  Seems to me that is exactly what he was doing.  Do you disagree?     BTW.........I rather like the tag line, as it speaks volumes:   Real Christians behave like Christians. Kevin Deegan wrote: Have you ever protested at an LDS Conference in SLC, or at the site of an LDS Temple or chapel?  If not....would you do so?  If so, then you would meet the one of the criteria of being an anti-Mormon as LDS folks have coined it.  If you haven't done any of those things (or others that might qualify you for that label), then perhaps I owe you an apology, Dean.   Dean is FEATURED on this ANTI-CHRISTIAN site. What EXACTLY is he saying that is wrong here?http://www.fairlds.org/pubs/media/street03bh.wmv Allen L. Wyatt, "Anti-Mormon Protesters at the April 2003 LDS General Conference," (Mesa, Arizona: FAIR, April 2003) In this short video clip, an anti-Mormon protester at the April 2003 General Conference shouts his opinions about the Book of Mormon, drowning out nearby missionaries trying to sing hymns. Another protester waves temple garments at passersby. ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: DaveH, please let me dissuade you from the false assumption that being called "anti-mormon" by mormons bothers anyone any more than being called a "homophobe" by sodomites.  It only makes the name-caller feel better, but falls on the ground beyond that.  iz   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dave Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 11:26 PM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Another darn Questionere!   DAVEH:   I can only view you from my perspective, Dean.   And my perspective is that I believe The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is the Lord's True Church.      Have you ever protested at an LDS Conference in SLC, or at the site of an LDS Temple or chapel?  If not....would you do so?  If so, then you would meet the one of the criteria of being an anti-Mormon as LDS folks have coined it.  If you haven't done any of those things (or others that mig ht qualify you for that label), then perhaps I owe you an apology, Dean. Dean Moore wrote: Dean Moore wrote:  cd: Dave satisfy my curiosity. As I answered your questions here DAVEH:   Yes, and I thank you for that, Dean.  Because of that I'll be happy to reciprocate, even though you are an anti-Mormon. cd: I would be helpful if you viewed me as anti-sin, pro-God, anti-antiChrist:-) As I am not focused on just the Mormon cult but all cults and false teachings-this you will learn if you pay attention. Labels only lead to misunderstanding of others and confuses their beliefs. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain six email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.