Dean wrote:
>     1Kg 4:26---Solomon had 40,000 stalls for the horses
>
>
>     2Chronicles 9:25---Solomon had 4,000 stalls for the horses
> cd: Can the KJV be so accurate that is talking of two different
> timelines and that the barn might have grown? Or can it be
> possibly speaking of two different barns one with 40,000 and
> another with 4,000 stalls which he bestowed to the chariot cities
> and the King of Jerusalem 2 CHR: 9: 25?

Perhaps, but I think the point is that the King James says "stalls" in both 
places.

Some scholars point out that the word translated in 2 Chron. 9:25 is 
slightly different.  It has a yod in it that is lacking in the word found in 
1 Kings 4:26.  The yod stands for ten, so some think that 2 Chron. 9:25 
refers to 4,000 stables, each with 10 stalls in it, and the 1 Kings 4:26 
passage refers to each individual stall, making 40,000 in all.

Dean wrote:
> ........or........
>     Mt 10:10 and Lk 9:3 where no staves are to be taken
>
>     compared to Mk 6:8 where a staff is to be taken
> cd: I will have to study this comparison more it may
> be one of those things taken out of the Bible that allows
> Satan to have great power over us and make a great
> many stumble.(I Nephi 13:29) I mean without a staff
> how can one beat him off right? Maybe he likes some
> (Mathew,John...etc) and told them to take staffs-but
> then there is Judas and his bunch ( similar to your
> side of the room) whom he maybe told not to take staffs
> to give them the butt kicking they deserved:-) Who really
> knows-right?

Consider that in Mark 6:8, the word staff is singular, whereas in the other 
passages, it refers to staves (plural).  Also note how the Mat. passage 
refers to not taking shoes (plural).  The Mark passage refers to being shod 
with sandals.  Therefore, the solution here is that they were to take one 
staff but not more than that, one pair of sandals that they wore, but not 
extra.

I think it is interesting that Mark is the one who focuses upon these 
individual items being allowed, because he was the one who abandoned Paul 
and Barnabas on their apostolic ministry trip.  It seems to me that he might 
have picked Peter's brain a bit about exactly what they were allowed to 
bring with them.  :-)

DaveH, I don't think there is any translating problem in these latter 
passages.  You have a point about the first examples.

Peace be with you.
David Miller. 

----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

Reply via email to