|
Eh? Got relatives in Canada eh?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: November 24, 2005 12:08
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
corrector/revisor
(hey DaveH--a new
TT record for concatenating responses, eh? :)
"Bill is
[sanctified]," is presumed, and, at best, [though eternal], (is) now;
therefore, the [sanctified-ness] is transitory [for now] which also
squares with human experience; therefore, the present
tense '[sanctified-]ness' is incomplete
"Bill is
[sad]," is presumed, and, at best, (is) now; therefore, the [sadness] is
transitory which also squares with human experience; therefore, the
present tense '[sad]ness' is incomplete
myth ("Bill
is happy," is presumed, and, at best, (is) now; therefore, the happiness
is transitory which also squares with human experience; therefore, the
present tense 'happiness' is incomplete)
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 09:02:32 -0500 "David
Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
||
> Present tense does not
necessarily indicate incomplete action.
> "Bill is happy,"
this does not mean that Bill is incomplete in his
>
happiness.
||
|
