|
Thanks. You illustrate my central point. This is
why I continue to say that your intent is not as perceived by some. I DO BELIEVE
IT IS NOT YOUR INTENT TO HURT OR WOUND. BTW, I also believe that you do not
write to accrue to yourself allies. However, you have them in Kevin, Terry,
David, Christine and, cd. (Linda strikes me as a Proverbs 31 kinda woman. She
appears as a friend to the friendless and a raconteur. When she goes beyond one
line she is often a delight to read.)
----- Original Message -----
Sent: November 25, 2005 23:24
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] 'Calvin's
beliefs are of Satan-He was an evil man' says Dean Moore
You are Bill and not Lance who made the
"accusation" to begin with but apparently you two are open to
the same kinds of thoughts. ATST the two of you are either unaware or ignorant as to just
how patronizing and arrogant most of what
you write to the list is for others.
Most everything Lance writes is an opinion that
includes a non flattering judgment toward somebody's person rather than a
contribution toward the subject at hand. And you Bill are so far
off into academia that you are speaking in another tongue
most of the time so far as I am concerned
anyway.
The red letters below are definitely
NOT "invective filled" I wrote them in good faith without the
intent to injure or wound and I do not consider myself the enemy of either of
you. It would be a good thing if both of you learned just who your
enemy is in reality because this is just one more of his firey
darts.
Great peace have they that love Thy Law and
nothing offends them (causes them to stumble)
Psalm
119:165
What "invective" filled language
Lance?
Examples please....
Oh the ignorance of those who don't see
things the way you do again Lance along with the fact that you are unable
or unwilling to produce an example of invective filled language coming
from me.
Let's see "INVECTIVE"
Okay, more below:
Hmmm - Just as I thought, the Holy
Spirit has been fired and men have taken over; men who exalt Greek present
passive verbs..
OK Kevin God
has spoken ... so now forever hold your
peace.....
[I]t's not easy to try and sort out
what Bill is saying here with Plato sitting in the RH
corner
Amazing how the devil jumps in
and shuts it down just when it starts getting good isn't
it??
Thank you for being a friend,
Bill
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, November 25, 2005 10:11
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] 'Calvin's
beliefs are of Satan-He was an evil man' says Dean Moore
Oh the ignorance of those who don't see things
the way you do again Lance along with the fact that you are unable
or
unwilling to produce an example of invective
filled language coming from me. Let's see "INVECTIVE"
Noah Webster 1828 - Invective Noun .... A railing
speech or _expression_; something uttered or written intended to cast
opprobrium, censure or reproach on another; a harsh or reproachful
accusation. It differs from reproof as the
latter may come from a friend and be intended for the good of the person
reproved; but invective
proceeds from an enemy, and is intended to give pain or to
injure. Is followed by against ie: He
uttered severe invectives against the unfortunate general.
Adjective: Satirical, abusive, railing
No Lance, it is not my ignorance it is your lack of
understanding. You feed on SNL, Bono, Dylan etc. and the fruit
of it is an inability to discern a friend from an enemy. I'm really
sorry about that.
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:57:30 -0500 "Lance Muir" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
I've always thought you unaware of the hurt
(read 'invective-filled language) you do to others through your speach,
Judy. I stand by that. However, this doesn't mean you don't do it. It
just means that you don't know you're doing it, IMO.
What "invective" filled language
Lance?
Examples please....
AND I DARESAY Judy, that your
invective-filled language on TT would equal or surpass that of John
Calvin WITHOUT QUESTION!! (In all candor so would mine, Kevin's,
Dean's, John's, and Linda's). The 'unnamed' regularly display
a model of 'engagement' that we all might aspire to.
Cd: 'Calvin's beliefs are of Satan-He was an evil man' says
Dean Moore
Obviously spoken by someone who has never read
the man.
Not one who has ever read 'The Insitute' would
ever say such as this!
Borrow the 2 volume set, Dean. Prayerfully,
give it a few hours. You may thereafter wish to
apologize.
Noone who has ever read Alice in
Wonderland would ever say the Lewis Carroll
was a cocaine addict
either.
I daresay that right now
Dean knows more of Christ than Calvin did when he wrote
his
Institutes and isn't Christ
alone the standard for His followers and is He not the
same
yesterday, today, and forever -
unchanged by time or culture?
Calvin's actions were unbiblical in the
extreme but were consistent with his theology
Isn't that fact reason enough to
question Calvinism itself and to examine it
carefully
from Scripture which is apparently what
Dean has been doing already?
I would say the advice above is
obviously spoken by someone who has never
read Dean - Why not take your own
advice Lance and you may thereafter wish
to apologize to him.
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His
Commandments
is a liar (1 John 2:4)
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His
Commandments
is a liar (1 John 2:4)
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His
Commandments
is a liar (1 John 2:4)
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His
Commandments
is a liar (1 John 2:4)
|
