:-)
> [Original Message] > From: Charles Perry Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Date: 11/25/2005 8:49:58 PM > Subject: [TruthTalk] Lance Mur says: I have a sense of DaveH that he ain't got it in 'em > > > Lance, the principle I was taught is that when you offend someone you > apologize...even if you didn't mean to, even if you were joking, even if you > think they are faking offense, apologizing is the right thing to do. Izzy > got it. Kevin got it. Evidently arrogant people don't get it. > > While I have railed heavily against Dave's faith, I have not generally > maligned the man. But, having been given this door of opportunity, let me > say how I really feel... > > It is not that Dave is a mormon. That is an unfortunate coincidence. It is > that he has behaved arrogantly. It is that has insulted most all on this > forum by arrogantly stating that "he is not here to learn the truth, he is > here to learn what protestants believe". It is that he has said he is here > to learn, but after being told over and over, he fails to learn. It is that > he has said he is not here to teach, then has proselytized us with his satan > inspired faith. It is that he levies his often tasteless humor on others, > but when they have been offended, he has rationalized his behavior, while > belittling the offended. He has taken the words of others and intentionally > twisted them to mean something else, then posted them. When claims are made > about his behavior, his memory is bad, but when he wants to make claims > against others, his memory is restored. > > And, it was HE who changed the subject line of the posts in question to > "Izzies Sexual Experiences". He is the one who twisted Dean's call for > moderation, to suggesting that I might know something of Izzies sexual > experiences. HE is the one with the perverse mind. HE is the one who does > not know where to draw the line on his so-called humor. And HIS response is > an arrogant rationalaztion that it is okay for him to say these things, and > for us to be opffended? Back off, Elder Muir! > > Perry > > >From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: [email protected] > >To: <[email protected]> > >Subject: [TruthTalk] Charles Perry Lock says 'A totally arrogant and > >insensitive reply, IMO' of Dave Hansen > >Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:53:48 -0500 > > > >I have a sense of DaveH that he ain't got it in 'em but, should anyone's > >door need showin' up at ...well...it's pretty obvious to me who they'd be. > >He's been spoken to and about with ill intent pretty much daily. As Tom > >Snyder used to say of people who behave like you guys have..'go to a > >mirror, look into it and, call yourself...(guess) > > > >IMO Perry, you're doing this more because he's a Mormon than because of > >what he purportedly meant by what he said. > > > >Iz rather graciously acknowledged her own participation and, requested that > >you let this go. Why not do that, Perry? > > > ---------- > "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org > > If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
