|
LOL! You make a good point, Judy.
Peace be with you.
David Miller.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2005 10:13
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:Judy on
...well....Judy
You practice this David and it does not appear to
help you with Lance, John, or Gary, but thanks for the suggestion.
Judy, instead of comparing your writings with those of Lance and John,
ask yourself whether or not there might not be more room for graciousness in
writing things like, "God has spoken" or "amazing how the devil jumps in and
shuts it down." It may be that your comments are warranted, but
perhaps there is a more gracious way of expressing it. If nothing
else, practice being a little more subtle and you will come across as being
more intellectually urbane. :-)
Peace be with you.
David Miller.
Here we go again - with you illustrating my point
made below as well. All five of this mornings lines consistare
solely of your diagnosis and personal opinion about persons who are members of this
list.
Thanks. You illustrate my central point.
This is why I continue to say that your intent is not as perceived by
some. I DO BELIEVE IT IS NOT YOUR INTENT TO HURT OR WOUND. BTW, I also
believe that you do not write to accrue to yourself allies. However, you
have them in Kevin, Terry, David, Christine and, cd. (Linda strikes me
as a Proverbs 31 kinda woman. She appears as a friend to the friendless
and a raconteur. When she goes beyond one line she is often a delight to
read.)
You are Bill and not Lance who made the
"accusation" to begin with but apparently you two are
open to the same kinds of thoughts. ATST the two of you are either unaware or ignorant as to
just how patronizing and arrogant most of what
you write to the list is for others.
Most everything Lance writes is an opinion
that includes a non flattering judgment toward somebody's person
rather than a contribution toward the subject at hand. And
you Bill are so far off into academia that you are speaking in another
tongue
most of the time so far as I am concerned
anyway.
The red letters below are definitely
NOT "invective filled" I wrote them in good faith
without the intent to injure or wound and I do not consider myself the
enemy of either of you. It would be a good thing if both of you
learned just who your enemy is in reality because this is just
one more of his firey darts.
Great peace have they that love Thy
Law and nothing offends them (causes them to stumble)
Psalm
119:165
What "invective" filled language
Lance?
Examples please....
Oh the ignorance of those who
don't see things the way you do again Lance along with the fact
that you are unable or unwilling to produce an example of
invective filled language coming from me.
Let's see "INVECTIVE"
Okay, more
below:
Hmmm - Just as I thought, the
Holy Spirit has been fired and men have taken over; men who exalt
Greek present passive verbs..
OK Kevin God has spoken ... so now forever hold your
peace.....
[I]t's not easy to try and
sort out what Bill is saying here with Plato sitting in the
RH corner
Amazing how the devil
jumps in and shuts it down just when it starts getting good isn't
it??
Thank you for being a friend,
Bill
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, November 25,
2005 10:11 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
'Calvin's beliefs are of Satan-He was an evil man' says Dean
Moore
Oh the ignorance of those who don't see
things the way you do again Lance along with the fact that you are
unable or
unwilling to produce an example of
invective filled language coming from me. Let's see
"INVECTIVE"
Noah Webster 1828 - Invective Noun .... A
railing speech or _expression_; something uttered or written
intended to cast opprobrium, censure or reproach on another; a
harsh or reproachful accusation. It differs
from reproof as the latter may come from a friend and be
intended for the good of the person reproved; but invective proceeds from an
enemy, and is intended to give pain or to injure. Is followed by against ie: He uttered severe
invectives against the unfortunate general.
Adjective: Satirical, abusive, railing
No Lance, it is not my ignorance it is your lack of
understanding. You feed on SNL, Bono, Dylan etc.
and the fruit of it is an inability to discern a friend from
an enemy. I'm really sorry about that.
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:57:30 -0500 "Lance Muir"
< [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
I've always thought you unaware of
the hurt (read 'invective-filled language) you do to others
through your speach, Judy. I stand by that. However, this
doesn't mean you don't do it. It just means that you don't know
you're doing it, IMO.
What "invective" filled language
Lance?
Examples please....
AND I DARESAY Judy, that your
invective-filled language on TT would equal or surpass that
of John Calvin WITHOUT QUESTION!! (In all candor so would
mine, Kevin's, Dean's, John's, and Linda's). The
'unnamed' regularly display a model of 'engagement'
that we all might aspire to.
Cd: 'Calvin's beliefs are of Satan-He was an evil
man' says Dean Moore
Obviously spoken by someone who has
never read the man.
Not one who has ever read 'The
Insitute' would ever say such as this!
Borrow the 2 volume set, Dean.
Prayerfully, give it a few hours. You may thereafter
wish to apologize.
Noone who has ever read Alice
in Wonderland would ever say the Lewis
Carroll
was a cocaine addict
either.
I daresay that right now
Dean knows more of Christ than Calvin did when he
wrote his
Institutes and
isn't Christ alone the standard for His
followers and is He not the same
yesterday, today, and forever -
unchanged by time or culture?
Calvin's actions were
unbiblical in the extreme but were consistent with his
theology
Isn't that fact reason enough
to question Calvinism itself and to examine it
carefully
from Scripture which is
apparently what Dean has been doing
already?
I would say the advice above is
obviously spoken by someone who has never
read Dean - Why not take your
own advice Lance and you may thereafter
wish
to apologize to
him.
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His
Commandments
is a liar (1 John 2:4)
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His
Commandments
is a liar (1 John 2:4)
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His
Commandments
is a liar (1 John 2:4)
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His
Commandments
is a liar (1 John 2:4)
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His
Commandments
is a liar (1 John 2:4)
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His
Commandments
is a liar (1 John 2:4)
|
