Re: [TruthTalk] Back to Heb 10:14

[ttxpress]

myth [while couch shopping at eBay, one salient saintly critique: Neither sanctification nor its grammar, whethr Eng or Gk, is an element of an 'equation'--no biblical author thinks of it in philosophical terms; correspondingly, math is not germane to biblical revelation partic while algorithmic rationalism/related systematic constructs are being annihilated by JCs personal soteriological blood-stained eschatology, the ongoing process of which forms (our) salvation history betw times of 'the Alpha and Omega' himself]   On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 20:41:51 -0500 "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: David Miller's comments in blue.   || for example, "Jesus sanctifies us" would be active voice, but "we are [being] sanctified by Jesus" would be passive voice...The passive voice does not attach this word "being" into the equation.