By the time what happens?  Birth control has certainly worked in China where they only allow one child per couple (and abort or abandon or murder the rest after birth), and  they are going to have a major crisis due to not enough children to care for the elderly.


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 7:26 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Assuming 500 more years..........

By the time this happens,   the worlds population will have more than doubled -   by the way.   I am not convinced of global warming and have seen it debated on two occasions.   But I am convinced that birth control is a necessity.    
 
-----Original Message-----
From: ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 18:09:44 -0600
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Re:On Assuming 500 more years..........

So much for the political viewpoint of scarcity because there are too many people.  A woman in my book club actually said that she and her husband only had one child because of world overpopulation.  What a crock! (Like global warming.) iz
 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 4:48 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Assuming 500 more years..........
 
World wide.   In fact, after we reach that point,  the world's populations will actually begin to decrease.   

-----Original Message-----
From: Terry Clifton <wabbits1234@earthlink.net>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 13:12:41 -0600
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Assuming 500 more years..........
Was that prediction nationwide or worldwide?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
Actually,   I recently heard on network news that hte population would slow to "no growth" within the next fifty years. 
 
 
 
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 09:36:14 -0500
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Assuming 500 more years..........
1. No different than the 'signs' of any other times.
2. No using up goin' on 'round here
3. Ever heard of WAR?
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Terry Clifton
Sent: December 02, 2005 08:44
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Assuming 500 more years..........
 
Three reasons.
1.  The signs of the times.
2.  We have just about used it up.
3. With the population doubling every few years, we will run out of room and food.

Lance Muir wrote:
Terry:
 
Why?
----- Original Message -----
From: Terry Clifton
Sent: December 02, 2005 07:42
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: bush song
 
Assuming that there will be an earth five hundred years from now would appear to be quite a stretch.  Maybe on Kolub??

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
..and 500 years from now, John Calvin's increasingly interesting influence on global fellowship with the Christ who partook of our human sufferings as God will be as vibrant as it is now, ~500 years after he wrote the Institutes, direct evidence of his historic, public faith in Christ
 
even as a politician he didn't hide it from anybody
 
 
 
 

Reply via email to