-----Original Message-----
From: Judy Taylor <jandgtaylor1@juno.com>
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Sent: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 11:45:39 -0500
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy once again employing the ad hom (Barf for Karl Barth)
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 11:35:48 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Frankly, the most ridiculous criticism of Barth I have ever seen.An absolutely laughable commentary.It's a short note and hardly a commentary but have a good laugh on me ...Barth's regard for the scripture's far exceeds anything I have read in your post.He appeals to no other source of information.When you don't believe your source to be accurate it opens the door to adding or subtracting at will. Stop with the lie, Judy. You have nothing to back up your claim but when has that slowed you down in the past. You want Barth to be a threat THEREFORE he is. He spent his lifetime presenting the Message of scripture -- a lifetime. He is all about the biblical message and you are all about making up stuff. Quite a difference.You criticize him for denying the infallibility of scripture (something that is an outright lie) while, at the same time, having no clue (talking about you, Judy) as to a definition for "inspiration." Heck, you can't even tell the difference between inspiration and revelation !!!The Holy Spirit is both inspiration and the source of divine revelation JD. Who has no clue? There's that old accuser again. In this case, the old accuser is you. Your comment verifies my point and makes no statement concerning Barth.Don't waste our time with some internet BS quotation that seems to show that Barth is in line with your claim about inerrancy.Correction: Barth is NOT in line with my claim that the scriptures are inerrant. Prove it.The fact of the matter is this : I challenge you to find a statement of Barth in his Dogmatics that challenges the wording of scripture and places his opinion above holy writ.You really think I would spend time wading through his "dogmatics" to find something like that for you to shoot down JD? So you admit that you have NOTHING against Barth except your own judgmentalism. Thanks. 'Nough said.
From: Judy Taylor <jandgtaylor1@juno.com>I know he would not pledge allegiance to Hitler which is noteworthy but the very fact that Hitler and his occult socialist system gained that much control in his country somewhat proves the impotency of his message. He did teach at a University there - right? So he influenced others with his unbelief. God judges Barth the man. I evaluate Barf the theologian who does not believe God's Word to be inerrant.
