This is my story and I'm stickin to it. Whether or not I approach privately will have to do with the nature of the offense, real or imagined , and my view of your receptiveness. In the past , you have been confused as to the nature of "ad hom," making a private complaint a poor expense of energy.
jd
-----Original Message-----
From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 19:12:19 -0500
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Virtue of Name Calling
JD wrote: > I find it humorous that you do not include yourself > in the following critical review relating to ad hom > comments. I do not believe that I should be making ad hominem arguments on this list. I try very hard not to do so. If you EVER think that I have, please write me privately off the list, with the quote, and I will either apologize to the list, or perhaps ask you if you might be a little hypersensitive. Either way, it will let me know how to back off from personal address. I find often, however, that when I attack your viewpoint, you take it as a personal attack. You have expressed before that you think it foolish to separate the man from what the man says. I disagree with that because viewpoints often change in the face of evidence. Peace be with you. David Miller. ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
