..think about this
Christine--it'll get you saved
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 22:24:53 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..yep, its essentially dualistic in a certain crucial kinda way--and JC explicitly forbids it:On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 22:09:30 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:..typical of western fundamentalists, [to] have two oft stated doctrinal matrices/antithetical reference points, & the economix of [such] conservatism requires both: that [ppl] serve God & mammon equally energetically simultaneously, else [they] ain't truly red white and blueOn Mon, 12 Dec 2005 20:37:08 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:yo--leaving jt speechless for a spell, how many doctrinal demands do you detect in your own mind set? tell us how you decide/d this: is it none? one? more than one?On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 19:45:51 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:27:35 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: jt met a bear. The bear met jt The bear was bulgy. The bulge was jt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:while there's (partic jts) doctrinal demandS, then there's more than one requirement for meaning (even in her own mind)On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 07:14:28 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:||No but, people will continue to do so.jtDo you think it should be chameleon like for ppl to form it into whatever shape fits their doctrinal demands?