|
Judy: Once again, Amen & Amen!
PS: The Person & the book are not one and the
same!
----- Original Message -----
Sent: December 14, 2005 10:14
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] TT Double
Standard
I don't think so DaveH, the Truth is a person
- who they hung on a tree for telling it like it
is.
So what is new under the
sun?
Is it good to be calling one
another hypocrites and disrespecting the
Moderator? Where do you think this kind
of attitude leads??
DAVEH:
The truth.
Judy Taylor wrote:
No Lance, I wouldn't acknowledge this to be the
case because everything that is spoken on TT is not the
Word of God, and not everything I write is
the Word of God because that would have to include opinion
at
times along with personal stories. So what
is the point you are trying to make here? Is it good to be
calling one
another hypocrites and disrespecting the
Moderator? Where do you think this kind
of attitude leads??
When you describe that which you say as THE
TRUTH OF THE WORD OF GOD Judy, while that spoken by another as OTHER
THAN the truth of the word of god, Judy then, you are doing the very
thing that you speak of as 'both discouraging and wearying'. Would you
not acknowledge this to be the case?
We should make accusing each other
personally a matter to be discussed offline.
I find these constant accusations to
be both discouraging and wearying - are we interested in Truth or
not? Why give the
enemy a platform to tear each other down.
DAVEH: I don't think you understand the nature of
my posts, Perry. I'm not talking about your sexual
experiences. I'm talking about Christian hypocrisy and the double standard as
practiced on TT. Is the double standard on TT not a
fair topic? Why should I have to discuss that matter
offline? Is this not relevant to all TTers,
Perry?
I find it very telling that you
make false accusations against me.......
you suggest I
might have some knowledge of Izzy's sexual
experiences,
.........which I did not do. Go back
and read my exact words if you don't believe me. If you can't
find them, I'll gladly provide them and you can see for yourself
that you are again accusing me of something I did not
do.
you suggest that saying "one of Joseph Smiths
spiritual wives" might have some sexual
connotation,
..........That has been suggested before on
TT by other TTers, and the moderator did nothing to discourage such
comments. Now you want to ban me from posting something other
TTers can post with no retribution. This is simply another
example of a double standard.
you try to spin Dean up by
suggesting he gets "excited" by sexual
references.
.........I merely stated the truth
about Deans sensitivity to such things. This was not an
ad-hom attack. Is the truth now a problem on TT?
People have said a lot more vile things about me with no
condemnation by the moderator. Why the double standard now,
Perry?
these amount to false
accusations,
DAVEH: How can that possibly
be a false accusation if it is true, Perry? If
anything, it is you who is making false
accusations about me in this matter. Once again....a
TT double standard.
the intentions of spinning Dean up
on a banned topic
DAVEH: You are
absolutely wrong again, Perry. You simply fail to understand
the nature of my posts. My intentions are not to spin up Dean
at all. It is you who I am trying to enlighten as to
the Christian hypocrisy involving the double standard practiced on
TT with regard to Mormons. Until you as the moderator
recognize it, why should I discontinue pointing it out every time it
occurs? Is not the TT double standard an acceptable discussion
topic?
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Dave, you suggest I might have some knowledge of
Izzy's sexual experiences, then you suggest that saying
"one of Joseph Smiths spiritual wives" might have some sexual
connotation, then you try to spin Dean up by
suggesting he gets "excited" by sexual references. These
amount to false accusations, with the intentions of
spinning Dean up on a banned topic. Any more posts from
you containing sexual references and I will have to take you off
the forum until you agree not to do so. Take any issues you have
up with me, offline, at this address, not on the forum.
Perry
From: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] ** Moderator comment **
Date:
Tue, 13 Dec 2005 07:29:32 -0800
* Please try to
/refrain /from making sexual references, especially /false
accuastions/.*
DAVEH: Let's see if I
understand this, Perry. Recently I asked some questions
that were no more sexually oriented than what you commonly make,
Dean then claimed foul......and you banned further discussion
based on the /perception /you and Dean had about what those
comments might have implied.
Now you have
made a comment that can be perceived to be sexually
charged..........
*If lucky, you may become one of his
many spirit wives! *
..........and you don't want to
recognize the double standard? It is interesting that when
you or other TTers make any kind of denigrating remarks toward
LDS theology with sexual implications, nothing is considered off
limits. When I point out this obvious double standard, I
am cautioned by the moderator to /refrain /from bringing the
discussion to the TT table under the guise of making/ false
accusations/. It must be convenient to have a moderator
who can see non-LDS posters through one non-judgmental eye, and
perceive a completely different perspective of LDS posters
through the other, more critical eye. I suppose if one has
an ax to grind against LDS theology, and is not embarrassed to
publicly admit such....then it should not surprise anybody to
find that person practicing a double standard. The curious
part about this is that it happens on a forum called
/TruthTalk/, where /truth /is presupposed to be the dominating
factor, yet it seems to be suppressed when it comes to
recognizing the Christian hypocrisy found here.
Charles
Perry Locke wrote:
Dave,
* Please try to
/refrain /from making sexual references, especially /false
accuastions/.* This is not the forum for that? I am sure there
are many discussion forums about sex if that type of
discussion interests you.
Perry
From: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: [TruthTalk] Perry's Sexually Suggestive
Comments
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 21:07:35 -0800
**If lucky, you may become one of his many spirit
wives! **
DAVEH: I wonder if Dean is
going to rebuke you for making such sexually suggestive
comments, Perry! If not, will we then have
another example of hypocritical Christianity in TT?
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Just be sure you remember your
secret password and secret handshake so Joseph Smith will
allow you entrance into heaven. *If lucky, you may become
one of his many spirit wives! *
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Signing off...
Date:
Mon, 12 Dec 2005 18:19:35 EST
I guess I
never got to know you, Christine--but hope to meet you
in the
great beyond--you may be required to testify
at the Bar of God as to what you
have seen and heard
on TT--
Blainerb
In a message dated
12/11/2005 11:24:52 P.M. Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I am signing off. I have gotten
sucked into the world of TT, and I think it
would be beneficial to my GPA to bid adeiu.
Thanks for all the discussions. I
have learned
a great deal. May the Lord bless you and keep you all.
It would be cool to meet you all in real
life some day. But maybe not all in
the same
room. I wonder how that would turn out... :-)
-Christine Miller
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His
Commandments
is a liar (1 John 2:4)
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His
Commandments
is a liar (1 John 2:4)
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find interesting,
I maintain six email lists...
JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His
Commandments
is a liar (1 John 2:4)
|
