Dave, this was a private post to you, which you brought on-line. That is
unexcusable behavior in my opinion. Furthmore, as moderator I asked you to
discontinue this thread, or take it private. You have violated that by
continuing it online. My goal was to resolve these discussions with you
between ourselves instead of continuing to disrupt the group. If you wish to
continue this discussion off-line, address me privately and we will. This is
your last warning.
Perry
From: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: TruthTalk <[email protected]>
Subject: [TruthTalk] TT Double Standard
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 00:01:13 -0800
DAVEH: I don't think you understand the nature of my posts, Perry. I'm
not talking about your sexual experiences. I'm talking about Christian
hypocrisy and the double standard as practiced on TT. Is the double
standard on TT not a fair topic? Why should I have to discuss that matter
offline? Is this not relevant to all TTers, Perry?
I find it very telling that /you /make false accusations against
me.......
*you suggest I might have some knowledge of Izzy's sexual experiences,*
.........which I did not do. Go back and read my exact words if you don't
believe me. If you can't find them, I'll gladly provide them and you can
see for yourself that you are again accusing me of something I did not do.
*you suggest that saying "one of Joseph Smiths spiritual wives" might have
some sexual connotation,*
..........That has been suggested before on TT by other TTers, and the
moderator did nothing to discourage such comments. Now you want to ban me
from posting something other TTers can post with no retribution. This is
simply another example of a double standard.
*you try to spin Dean up by suggesting he gets "excited" by sexual
references.*
.........I merely stated the /truth /about Deans sensitivity to such
things. This was not an ad-hom attack. Is the /truth /now a problem on
TT? People have said a lot more vile things about me with no condemnation
by the moderator. Why the double standard now, Perry?
_*these amount to false accusations,*_
DAVEH: How can that possibly be a _*false accusation*_ if it is true,
Perry? If anything, it is /you /who is making _*false accusations*_ about
me in this matter. Once again....a TT double standard.
/*the intentions of spinning Dean up on a banned topic*/
DAVEH: You are absolutely wrong again, Perry. You simply fail to
understand the nature of my posts. My intentions are not to spin up Dean
at all. It is /you /who I am trying to enlighten as to the Christian
hypocrisy involving the double standard practiced on TT with regard to
Mormons. Until /you /as the moderator recognize it, why should I
discontinue pointing it out every time it occurs? Is not the TT double
standard an acceptable discussion topic?
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Dave, *you suggest I might have some knowledge of Izzy's sexual
experiences,* then *you suggest that saying "one of Joseph Smiths
spiritual wives" might have some sexual connotation,* then *you* *try to
spin Dean up by suggesting he gets "excited" by sexual references.*
T_*hese amount to false accusations,*_ with /*the intentions of spinning
Dean up on a banned topic*/. Any more posts from you containing sexual
references and I will have to take you off the forum until you agree not
to do so. Take any issues you have up with me, offline, at this address,
not on the forum.
Perry
From: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] ** Moderator comment **
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 07:29:32 -0800
* Please try to /refrain /from making sexual references, especially
/false accuastions/.*
DAVEH: Let's see if I understand this, Perry. Recently I asked some
questions that were no more sexually oriented than what you commonly
make, Dean then claimed foul......and you banned further discussion based
on the /perception /you and Dean had about what those comments might have
implied.
Now you have made a comment that can be perceived to be sexually
charged..........
*If lucky, you may become one of his many spirit wives! *
..........and you don't want to recognize the double standard? It is
interesting that when you or other TTers make any kind of denigrating
remarks toward LDS theology with sexual implications, nothing is
considered off limits. When I point out this obvious double standard, I
am cautioned by the moderator to /refrain /from bringing the discussion
to the TT table under the guise of making/ false accusations/. It must
be convenient to have a moderator who can see non-LDS posters through one
non-judgmental eye, and perceive a completely different perspective of
LDS posters through the other, more critical eye. I suppose if one has
an ax to grind against LDS theology, and is not embarrassed to publicly
admit such....then it should not surprise anybody to find that person
practicing a double standard. The curious part about this is that it
happens on a forum called /TruthTalk/, where /truth /is presupposed to be
the dominating factor, yet it seems to be suppressed when it comes to
recognizing the Christian hypocrisy found here.
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Dave,
* Please try to /refrain /from making sexual references, especially
/false accuastions/.* This is not the forum for that? I am sure there
are many discussion forums about sex if that type of discussion
interests you.
Perry
From: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: [TruthTalk] Perry's Sexually Suggestive Comments
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 21:07:35 -0800
**If lucky, you may become one of his many spirit wives! **
DAVEH: I wonder if Dean is going to rebuke you for making such
sexually suggestive comments, Perry! If not, will we then have
another example of hypocritical Christianity in TT?
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Just be sure you remember your secret password and secret handshake so
Joseph Smith will allow you entrance into heaven. *If lucky, you may
become one of his many spirit wives! *
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Signing off...
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 18:19:35 EST
I guess I never got to know you, Christine--but hope to meet you in
the
great beyond--you may be required to testify at the Bar of God as to
what you
have seen and heard on TT--
Blainerb
In a message dated 12/11/2005 11:24:52 P.M. Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am signing off. I have gotten sucked into the world of TT, and I
think it
would be beneficial to my GPA to bid adeiu. Thanks for all the
discussions. I
have learned a great deal. May the Lord bless you and keep you all.
It would be cool to meet you all in real life some day. But maybe
not all in
the same room. I wonder how that would turn out... :-)
-Christine Miller
----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you
ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
