Can you print the entire context, please?
Blainerb
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 1:00 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Izzy's sex life
>
>Hi Izzy, I was looking through some of my old e-mails and came upon
one with the above subject title--jus' thought I'd let you know I am still
>waiting with 'bated breath for your more complete description . . .
>
>Blainerb
>Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 1:00 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Izzy's sex life
>
>Hi Izzy, I was looking through some of my old e-mails and came upon
one with the above subject title--jus' thought I'd let you know I am still
>waiting with 'bated breath for your more complete description . . .
>
>Blainerb
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 12/16/2005 2:03:37 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:Since you have been asked to stop stirring the potAnd some subjects have been identified as OFF LIMITSI have declined to commentBut since you guys can not leave it aloneI was refering to your PRIVATE email off list to a member of this list stating you were"waiting with 'bated breath for your more complete description . . ."First of all, I don't recall writing to anyone in private. If I did, it may have been because I had not noticed it was private. Who was it that got the letter in private, Kevin? Are you the one? It must have been you, or Dean--both of you have brought this up--and if it was private why did you post it contrary to the rules?.Secondly, I vaguely remember making that comment, but I don't recall the context in which I made it. Can you print the entire context, please?Blainerb
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

