RE: [TruthTalk] For Lance

[ShieldsFamily]

Well, duh—I guess that means she didn’t call YOU the Accuser.  iz   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 12:52 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] For Lance   Bingo  !!!  And do you think that we are all stupid enough not to know who the Accuser is?    -------------- Original message -------------- From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> FYI, jd, when someone speaks of the Accuser, they may be speaking about the spirit motivating you; not you personally.  Get it? iz   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 8:38 PM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] For Lance   These words  I didn't understand it JD,  It was incomprehensible to me .... struck me as casting my writing in the same light as DM often does.   I regard such as blatant arrognace.   I do not believe for a second that Judy could not understand what I wrote !!      She pretends to not be at war with me -  yet she opposes my words with every post.  She has called me the Accuser, knowing full well the biblcal usage of that word.   I consider the source, but it does get tiring.    That she is not at war with me is simply not believable.  I see no sincerity in her post.  Sorry.   -------------- Original message -------------- From: Terry Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Where is the arrogance, John?  This is one of her better efforts.  Give credit where it is due.  Please?  We are sposed to be family.  Let's try harder. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Arrogance will get you nowhere.   -------------- Original message -------------- From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I didn't understand it JD, It was incomprehensible to me and I don't consider myself at war with you. I was not intentionally being rude about it and didn't know you wanted an answer. Guess I am so used to being set up and then knocked down here. Sorry about that.  ATST you are misjuding me.   On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 23:10:04 +0000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Do you not ignore questions I ask of you, nearly everyday?   The post written last night asking about a "truce"  ??   That was written under the direction of the Holy Spirit, Judy.  It was a very emotional experience and clearly, from God.   Your response?  Ignore, ignore , ignore.    jd    From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   You have not answered my question Lance ... are you going to ignore this one also?   You wrote:   You are a tripartate who has a disdain for things of the earth which by extension indicates that you do not apprehend the significance of the Incarnation and the humanity of Jesus.   Do you actually believe your salvation comes through Jesus' humanity Lance? What does that mean - and in the light of it - Please tell me what the scripture below means:   "and so it is written. The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit.  Howbeit that was not first which is spiritual. The first man is of the earth earthy; the second man is the Lord from heaven. As is the earthy such are they also that are earthy; and as is the heavenly, such are they also that are heavenly.  And as we have borne the image of the earthy, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly.  Now this I say brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God, neither doth corruption inherit incorruption"  (2 Cor 15:45-50)                                          judyt                                        He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His Commandments                               is a liar (1 John 2:4)                                            judyt                                        He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His Commandments                               is a liar (1 John 2:4)