DAVEH:   Thanx for the explanation.   I still don't quite understand why/how you would think punitive torture equates (or perhaps equates to justice) to love of the rest of society though.....unless you are figuring retribution into the equation.  

David Miller wrote:
The love being expressed is not toward the one being damned, but toward the rest of society.  It is impossible to have a utopian community of love if there is even one single wicked person living freely in it.  Just look at the world and what a mess it is in.
 
Peace be with you.
David Miller.
What do you think the judgment of hell is all about?

DAVEH:  I've heard you make that comment before, DavidM.   But I'm not sure why you think that way if you believe in the traditional concept of hell being a place of punitive torture.   Doesn't the harshness of the pain and suffering caused by the literal lake of fire and eternal worms believed by many Christians seem to go beyond the punishment of love?   I thought it was considered by most Christians to be retribution, rather than reformation....which would more likely stem from love, I would think.

      From the LDS perspective of hell though, your comment would make perfect sense.



The Lord is a man of war.  What you seem to fail to understand is that killing the wicked is a loving thing to do.  What do you think the judgment of hell is all about?  It is the greatest act of love that God could ever practice toward mankind.  Some are too selfish and wicked to recognize that, kind of like a child who thinks that the parent who spanks his child hates his child.
 
Peace be with you.
David Miller.

Reply via email to