DM:
 
We are all helped on hearing that which you do not believe, David. We are not helped insofar as knowing that which you do believe on this most important of discussions. You ask questions of Bill, John, Judy, Gary, Lance etc. All well and good, DM. Why not do what you do so well, namely, write a definitive statement relfecting DM's teaching on just who Jesus was/is and lace it with Scripture? I believe Bill Taylor came onto TT as a result of a then ongoing discussion concerning the humanity of Christ. Shall we come full circle and, once again, be treated to your position on this?
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: January 14, 2006 13:47
Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Christ - incarnate God (Judy)

Lest anyone be deceived further by Gary's comments, let me clarify yet again that I do not believe that "JC ceased to be God."  The mindset he is talking about is a figment of his imagination.
 
David Miller
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2006 10:18 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Christ - incarnate God (Judy)

the mindset in which you dwell is that JC ceased to be God
 
this point is at root level, Bro: e.g., Phil 2 is biblical, take it  to the bank--the NT never touches your mind/set, that JC himself ain't the divine
 
God's divinity is essential in essence greater than God's glory like one's humanity is essential/ly true, in contrast to one's (idea of) authority & power
 
"As great as you are a man, you'll never be greater than yourself."
                                    --fat nancy, 2001
::
 
As great as you are..[God], you'll never be greater than yourself.
                                   --g     
 
 
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 23:56:17 -0500 "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oh, it is Biblical, Gary.
>
> Philippians 2:5-9
||
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 11:02 PM
> Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Christ - incarnate God (Judy)
>
> myth (indeed, evidence suggests that you're a philosopher, also not
> a very  good one; that there is no way the ff. is either true or biblical)
>
> On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:54:33 -0500 "David Miller"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> writes:
> <<[JC] had laid aside his divinity, meaning that he had laid aside
> the glory that he had with the Father.>>
||

Reply via email to