----- Original Message -----
Sent: January 17, 2006 16:06
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] TT's ??
Thanks for your input Dean;
I have no problem with Jesus having a human flesh
body... but I have a "huge" insurmountable problem
with the idea that Mary's child, the one called by
the angel "the holy pure sinless offspring" born of her
and called the Son of God" (Luke 1:36 Amp)
ATST had a "fallen" Adamic nature. Make no mistake
this
is nothing more than speculation by religious men who
have no understanding about spiritual realities.
cd: Nor do we reject one or the other - we
just don't relate to him in the fallen state of man-
and I see us regenerated towards His higher
state. I am wondering why we cannot be understood
on this statement - what force works against
Judy and I on this? Is it an us against them thingy or
is it Satan that stills this seed? There
is no us against them with me there is only truth as best as
I understand it.
Respectfully
These
are great passages, Dean; they speak to his divinity, his being God. Ours
has been a discussion of his humanity, his being human. To reject one
or the other is to reject him.
cd: Yes I like them also-part of my favorite
passages.Question: Did that divinity leave him while on earth-What does he
say in the New Covenant that differs from Prov.8?
Bill
