Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?

Thu, 02 Feb 2006 14:14:42 -0800

 
Where in NT scripture do you find the conversion of a single child? 
 
A child is not lost, for starters  --   so there is no need.   
 
What child evangelism does is this  --  it gives the adult church the false sense that it is taking the gospel to the world.   I wouldn't mind "child conversions" if there was some kind of confirmation as they reached an adult age.   80% of all reported conversions in the US are children.  Not the case with the underground Church such as in China.    
 
jd
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:
Sent: 2/2/2006 2:00:44 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?

I do not believe in child evangelism. 
 
jd
cd: This makes me sad John.
 
-------------- Original message --------------
From: "Dean Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: 2/2/2006 5:56:46 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?

There is and the Passover lamb was for the whole household, including children.  judyt
cd: If a young person can be saved at a young age then common sense believes that one can be lost at a young age Judy.
 
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 06:12:56 +0000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So why is there no sin offering for children under the Old Law?  
 
jd
 
----- Original Message -----
From:
Sent: 2/1/2006 1:19:33 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?

David makes some good points, here, Dean. 
 
At some point in life, Hitler had a choice.   at some point in time, Hitler was not the devil we know him to be.   At some point in time,  he was as innocent and impressionable as your children. 
 
cd: That would only matter if one believes we are innocent-I don't believe such.The only impression Christ had was given by God Himself the rest is conjecture. Thanks-but Christ never became a heathen. 
 
If there ever was a contrast in response to our Adamic nature,  it is seen in the lives of Jesus and Hitler.  
 
jd
 
-------------- Original message --------------
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> Dean wrote:
> > Then how can can the Second Adam be
> > the same as the first?
>
> He's not. Jesus was unique because of his spirit, not his flesh.
>
> Dean wrote:
> > You guys are stating that Christ was no
> > different than Hitler
>
> Not true.
>
> Dean wrote:
> > but Hitler was the same as the first Adam
> > "exactly the same"-in the above you show
> > the second Adam to be different. This is
> > our point.If Christ was the same as the first
> > we are still in our sins Bill.
>
> Nobody is saying that Jesus was not different. We are talking about the
> details of how he was unique. Was his physical body unique, or his spirit,
> or both? We say his spirit was un ique. His birth was unique. On the other
> hand, his physical body came from the loins of David. How do you deal with
> Acts 2:30, Dean?
>
> David Miller
>
> ----------
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how
> you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend
> who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> he will be subscribed.
 

Reply via email to