|
Well......there's those 'friends' of DM @ UofF.
jt: I take it you refer to those involved in
the perversion of what was good at the beginning..
HOWEVER, I'd ask you, JT, what I asked Dean..is
God the Father Male?
jt: Well the word father means something Lance -
and it most certainly does not mean mother (female)
and, just what does that mean?
jt: Don't tell me you are so into the
enlightenment that you don't know what the word means Lance...
Sent: February 07, 2006 08:59
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] God
Male?
Have you ever seen or heard of a female "father?" Lance
CLARIFICATION PLEASE, DEAN: Are you saying
(meaning) that GOD IS MALE?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: February 07, 2006 08:39
Subject: [TruthTalk] God
Male?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: 2/7/2006 8:04:18 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Rightousness (jd 2 cd)
Dwight Friesen (Divine Dance...12/20/002) p.3: "God is neither male
nor female".
How can this be as we were created in the image of the Father and
women were created from a part of Adam? How can there be Father
,Son,and Holy Ghost when the Father "is neither male nor female"-Your
gospel is headed into a strange area John-one that makes the gospel
feminine and more acceptable in this modern society.
Dean, please post the link to this
quotation, as it appears to have been quoted out of context.
Bill
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, February 07,
2006 5:08 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Rightousness (jd 2 cd)
----- Original Message -----
Sent: 2/6/2006 6:16:28 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Rightousness (jd 2 cd)
Actually, Dean, I have no reason to talk to someone
who claims I make Jesus a liar. You can go
straight to if you think that such opens my heart to what you have
to say.
Obviously, this moderator thing went to your
head.
You deceived me into thinking that we were having a
dialogue. And your deception was well done. You
fooled me. But never again. I have given you more
scripture than you can remember but you allow NONE of it
to effect your bias.
Be that as it may.
jd
----------------------------------------------
cd: John, You yourself stated we were preaching
different gospels-You said" I am not interested in a hopeless
gospel." . I have thought on this all last night and this
morning and you are correct-we are preaching different gospels and
because of that I cannot invite You or Bill to preach with
me.
Gal 1:9 As we said before, so say I now again, if any
man preach any
other gospel unto you than that ye have
received, let him be accursed.
My Gospel can explain-and incorporates-all the
verses you sent to me that came from the Bible and yours has to
ignore most of the verses I sent to you that came from the Bible.
I realize you are going to take this hard but out of caring for
your souls I will continue on by saying you do not teach/preach
the Christian Gospel. The gospel you preach is a feminine Gospel
weakened down to conform to society. Baxter's newsletter stated
that God wasn't a male 12/20/002 (see below). The below was
printed in the Perichoresis newletter March 2006
p.3.
..a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the
faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that
we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works
of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be
justified.
This next passage is ignored. John -these
passages belong togeter to complete the thought. Your Gospel
doesn't allow for v.17.
Gal 2:17 But if,
while we seek to be justified by Christ, we
ourselves also are found sinners, is therefore Christ
the minister of sin? God forbid.
Dwight Friesen (Divine Dance...12/20/002) p.3:
"God is neither male nor female".
How can this be as we were created in the image of
the Father and women were created from a part of Adam? How can
there be Father ,Son,and Holy Ghost when the Father "is neither
male nor female"-Your gospel is headed into a strange area
John-one that makes the gospel feminine and more acceptable in
this modern society.
cd: Know that I am praying for you guys
John.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: 2/6/2006 12:25:32
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Rightousness (jd 2 cd)
You have done two things with this post. First, you
have made it clear that we are no longer discussing
anything -- accusing those who do not agree with
you as calling Christ a liar
----------------- a lie in and of
itself!!!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cd: John -All I am trying to do is make you
think. It is not me you are disagreeing with it is the words
Christ spoke. Christ /Bible says one thing you say the
opposite-both cannot be correct.To state something other than
what is written is to oppose what is written-see beolw. You
state no one can lose his salvation-the bible says
otherwise-someone is not speaking truth -think about
it.
------------------------------------------------------
Secondly, because of your predilection to works and
your view of the gospel, you feel absolutely no need to square
your claims with any number of seemingly opposing
scripture.
It makes no difference to legalists that they have no
message of hope in the offing for those who continue to be
addicted to one sin or another. I am not interested
in a hopeless gospel.
-------------------------------------------------------
cd: Well then we will see, in time,if it is
hopeless gospeland as you are not interested I retire
sir.
---------------------------------------
jd
----- Original Message -----
Sent: 2/6/2006
12:23:52 AM
Subject: Re:
[TruthTalk] Rightousness (jd 2 cd)
Yes. One can't detract from our salvation and
the Other won't !!
cd: The why did God say such wrong statements? He
said He would 'detract"-Why would Jesus lie me? I
need to ask him; " Jesus why did you lie to me and say the
things of Rev. 3 and Matt. 25-John , Gary,Bill and
Lance told me you were lying".That will be included
in my prayer tonight.
Rev 3:5 He that
overcometh, the same
shall be clothed in white
raiment; and I will not blot
out his name out of the book of life
Mat 25:26 His lord answered
and
said
unto
him,
Thou wicked and
slothful servant, thou knewest
that
I
reap where I sowed not, and gather
where I have not strewed:
Mat 25:27 Thou oughtest
therefore to have put my money to the exchangers,
and
then at my coming I & amp; amp;
amp; amp; lt; /FONT>should have received
mine own with usury.
Mat 25:28 Take therefore
the
talent from him, and give it unto him which hath
ten
talents.
Mat 25:29 For unto everyone
that hath shall be given,
and
he
shall have
abundance: but from him that hath not shall be taken away
even
that
which he hath.
Mat 25:30 And
cast
ye
the
unprofitable servant into outer
darkness: there shall
be
weeping and gnashing of teeth.
-------------- Original message --------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
isn't it interesting, such
fellowship's both human &
divine?
Never thought of it from that angle.
An absolutely excellent point.
--------------
Original message --------------
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
..foundational to our eternal
security
fellowship, in Christ, is already
eternal, a key doctrinal
essential
Huh. Apparently I wrote that damn
"open letter to Dean" a few hours too
soon.
||
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous
content by Plains.Net,
and is
believed to be clean.
|
