|
Sorry Christine but, this is just is just Christine
'McMiller' speaking (as in Edgar Bergen & Charlie McCarthy - for Judy's
research). The harm done to women, both in the church and in society at large,
by your Dad and, by extension, yourself is reprehensible. You may one day have a
'voice' of your own but, for the time being you are but an androgenous version
of DM.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: February 08, 2006 15:52
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fem. God- Dave
H. get bathing suit.
Why is sexism a bad thing, Lance? I know you have been
brainwashed to understand that term to mean something horrible and unethical,
but we would be foolish to ignore that men and women are different from one
another. I appreciate you offering me an apology, but I was not offended by
Dean's remarks. Even if I was offended, Dean is entitled to his opinion, and
should not lose his office of Moderator for having an opinion that isn't
politically correct. You are attempting to institute Thought Crime, here,
Lance.
I'm pretty sure George Orwell wrote "1984" as a warning, not as
a How-to Book.
Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Sorry Judy? How about sorry Christine, Mrs.
David Miller, Mrs. everybody who might read this thoroughly sexist remark.
How about David 'lifting' you as Moderator (?) immediately? This remark,
IMO, goes far beyond the minor engagement between DH and miscellaneous
others.
As to the latter Dean, it is always wise to
know when someone WON'T be 'proven wrong' on an issue. I perceive that this
is one of those, Dean.
-----
Original Message -----
Sent:
February 08, 2006 11:49
Subject:
[TruthTalk] Fem. God- Dave H. get bathing suit.
-----
Original Message -----
Sent:
2/8/2006 11:34:58 AM
Subject:
Re: [TruthTalk] Rightousness (jd 2 cd)
Originality not being your
strong suit Dean, you are to be commended on parroting Judy's perpetual
jibe. As neither of you knows whereof you speak, we'll just smile in
response. Of all things that I'd not anticipated from you, JT & DM
was 'buddying up' with the Mormons. You may just be out of your league
as Moderator. You are out of your league theologically. Mayhap a call to
DM would prove helpful prior entering the ring on this one again. You
will need much more than Webster's dictionary, I'm
afraid.\
cd: :-) Hello DavH O' buddy
how are you today-aren't you glad our God isn't feminine so the earth
won't be flooded once a month(sorry Judy-but I'm getting visions of
an angry female God with lighting bolts-scary)?So Lance why don't you
prove me wrong instead of waiting to agree with the
disagreeables.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: February 08, 2006 11:14
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Rightousness (jd 2
cd)
----- Original Message -----
Sent: 2/8/2006 10:56:08 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Rightousness (jd 2
cd)
FWIW Bill,
I'd suggest that we leave Dean, DM, JT and perhaps even DH, to Amen
one another on this issue. You are correct that they are
flirting with a position remarkably close to the Mormons. One can
'hear' the level of certitude being
expressed.
cd:
Well .Lance that could leave you time to work on you language-what
is it called again? Dancing English? A language that
changes meaning when you want it to-which will go well with
your Dancing bible and your Dancing
gospel.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: February 08, 2006
10:10
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Rightousness
(jd 2 cd)
----- Original Message -----
Sent: 2/7/2006 10:15:34 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Rightousness
(jd 2 cd)
cd: Is Jesus
male or female John/Lance/Bill-If he is God as you say what is
he?
Jesus is a man, Dean, and he is God -- two natures in one
person. Please stop confusing the two.
You create God in Adam's image, and Judy calls us
earthly minded: what a joke! Have you considered how close you
are getting to a doctrine which claims that God the
Father came down and had physical-sexual intercourse with
Mary? You do claim he is male, don't you? That's like saying,
since he has the equipment, why didn't he use it? This is
ridiculous. "Male" is a physical/biological term. "Father" is a
relational term, the same with "Son." You don't have to confuse
the two. Yes, sometimes these terms coincide, but
they are not requited to. Please, brother, stop with
the accusations and smears (what has gotten into you?!), and
just consider for a moment what you are suggesting: that God,
being Spirit, has to have male attributes, over
against female or a mixture of both -- as if he
must have something between his legs or he can't be
God. My gosh, people, he is Spirit; he is neither male,
nor female -- nor both. Stop with the
foolishness.
Bill
cd: I realize you guys will not
accept the Webster definition for the meaning of English words-
as the rest of the world does- and have developed a whole
new language but that is what I am using. To have a
masculine quality is to be a male. God doesn't have a sexual
organ as one is not needed in heaven as He can
create humans from rocks or bones and still be the provider
for the family as is the Father of a family. Thank you for the
using words like silly-foolish and such like as you are only
verifying my position in Jesus Christ and building my
future:-) Notice # 4 if you are able-in the English language one
can be male without the organ .Hence a masculine spirit is
a male spirit-What are you not getting Bill-is all that dancing
around making you
tired?
Masculine
M`ASCULINE, a.
[L. masculinus, from masculus,
mas.]
1. Having the qualities of a man;
strong; robust; as a masculine
body.
2. Resembling man; coarse; opposed
to delicate or soft; as masculine
features.
3. Bold; brave; as a masculine spirit or
courage.
4. In grammar,the masculine gender
of words is that which expresses a male, or something analogous to it;
or it is the gender appropriated to males,
though not always expressing the male
sex.
Brings words and photos together (easily) with
PhotoMail
- it's free and works with Yahoo! Mail.
|
