-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> As different as the old God is from your own specialized new god JD
> Why is His Law which is holy, just, and good, such a threat to you? I
> find this a curiosity. Since
> God's law reflects His nature and character. How can one profess to love
> Him and ATST
> reject His Word? You explain. The Words Jesus spoke were the Father's.
> The standard for
> a new covenant believer is higher than that of the scribes and pharisees
> under the Law - So
> your doctrine of "sin covering grace" will not stand under scrutiny JD.
> Jesus fulfilled God's Law
> and we are also to fulfill it through Him .. and this is not - He does it
> and we get the credit while
> still in our mess. It is He gave us the example and we follow "in His
> steps" to do likewise. judyt
>
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:06:12 +0000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Ah, the Good News -- and it is so different from the Old Law !! Wow!!
>
> You have no idea which is Old Testament and which is New Testament. You
> do not see the Cross as that which ends the Law through fulfillment and
> Begins the administration of Grace apart from Law (there has always been
> grace, of course.)
>
> Any who are addicted to some habit of sin before you get to them is
> clearly lost afterwards. You, my dear, are the new Judyizer !!
>
> jd
>
> From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Looks like neither of you have read the prophets, or books in the Bible
> such as Lamentations where God's
> own ppl are literally "judged by fire" Yes He is merciful and
> longsuffering but even God has limits; also we
> are to adjust to His understanding gentlemen since we are the ones in
> need of a new heart and a renewed
> mind; He has already done all He is going to do. Todays gospel? Repent
> or perish!!!!
>
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 04:46:04 +0000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> It appears there are two judges -- The Judge and The Impostor. If
> judgment has to do with bringing ppl into the relationship [and such is
> the only judgment presented to the modern day saint] , the judgment is
> easily assessed. Drive them [the ppl] away and the judgment is not of
> God. "Impostor" is the only remaining conclusion. jd
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> the Judge himself actually judges ppl with understanding, gentlemen--he
> engenders understanding with wisdom and righteousness as he goes, as he
> renders truth truthfully among us who know him--the stark contrast of
> your spirits & methods provoke me (to comment:) (in this context:)
>
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:24:23 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> ..& the Moderator smugly postures himself the same way as you do, Bro;
> e.g.:
>
> On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 06:21:13 -0500 "Dean Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> writes:
> "..not to [separate the two G] would make one prone to error.
> Error #2"
>
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:12:39 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Miller
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: February 12, 2006 15:02
> Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fem. God- Dave H. get bathing suit.
>
>
> you copied and pasted...from another site without actually going to it
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:05:09 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
> intrinsically, below, [& above] you've postured yourself to (be) Judge
> [in public insinuating what you want ppl to think--which in truth is not
> 'witholding judgement']
>
>
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:13:46 -0500 "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> writes:
> I have withheld judgment
>
> ||
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 10:35 AM
> Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fem. God- Dave H. get bathing suit.
>
>
> then, like the Moderator, you also Judge ppl in your finitude within v
> narrow human limits (with perfection, of course)
>
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:12:57 -0500 "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> writes:
> What I did not understand, and still don't understand, is why Gary did
not post the other information on that page.
--- Begin Message ---
As different as the old God is from your own
specialized new god JD
Why is His Law which is holy, just, and good, such a
threat to you? I find this a curiosity. Since
God's law reflects His nature and character. How
can one profess to love Him and ATST
reject His Word? You explain. The Words
Jesus spoke were the Father's. The standard for
a new covenant believer is higher than that of the
scribes and pharisees under the Law - So
your doctrine of "sin covering grace" will not stand
under scrutiny JD. Jesus fulfilled God's Law
and we are also to fulfill it through Him .. and this
is not - He does it and we get the credit while
still in our mess. It is He gave us the example
and we follow "in His steps" to do likewise. judyt
Ah, the Good News -- and it is so different from the Old Law
!! Wow!!
You have no idea which is Old Testament and which is New Testament.
You do not see the Cross as that which ends the Law through
fulfillment and Begins the administration of Grace apart from Law
(there has always been grace, of course.)
Any who are addicted to some habit of sin before you get to them is
clearly lost afterwards. You, my dear, are the new Judyizer
!!
jd
From:
Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Looks like neither of you have read the
prophets, or books in the Bible such as Lamentations where
God's
own ppl are literally "judged by fire" Yes He
is merciful and longsuffering but even God has limits; also
we
are to adjust to His understanding gentlemen since
we are the ones in need of a new heart and a renewed
mind; He has already
done all He is going to do. Todays gospel? Repent or
perish!!!!
It appears there are two judges -- The Judge and The
Impostor. If judgment has to do with bringing ppl into the
relationship [and such is the only judgment presented to the modern
day saint] , the judgment is easily assessed. Drive them
[the ppl] away and the judgment is not of God. "Impostor" is
the only remaining conclusion. jd
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
the Judge himself actually
judges ppl with understanding, gentlemen--he engenders understanding
with wisdom and righteousness as he goes, as he renders truth
truthfully among us who know him--the stark contrast of your spirits
& methods provoke me (to comment:) (in this
context:)
..& the Moderator smugly
postures himself the same way as you do, Bro;
e.g.:
"..not to [separate the two
G] would make one prone to error.
Error
#2"
----- Original Message -----
Sent: February 12, 2006
15:02
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fem.
God- Dave H. get bathing suit.
you copied and pasted...from
another site without actually going to
it
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
intrinsically, below,
[& above] you've postured
yourself to (be) Judge [in public
insinuating what you want ppl to think--which in truth is
not 'witholding judgement']
I have withheld
judgment
||
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, February
13, 2006 10:35 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Fem. God- Dave H. get bathing suit.
then, like the
Moderator, you also Judge ppl in
your finitude within v narrow human limits (with
perfection, of course)
What I did not
understand, and still don't understand, is why Gary did not
post the other information on that
page.
--- End Message ---
