IFO took your, and Judy's, evaluation of John Calvin to be nothing short of an insult. However, should you 'rule' on this matter thus eliminating your/my assessment to be off limits then, we would have no ongoing dialogue.
 
By the way, wasn't there some kind of mystery 'rule' about not responding to posts with the above subject heading?
----- Original Message -----
From: Dean Moore
Sent: February 26, 2006 07:10
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] *********** To all list members-Moderator Comment***************

 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Lance Muir
Sent: 2/26/2006 4:13:42 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] *********** To all list members-Moderator Comment***************

You spoke my question "G"?????????
Moderator-This simply means that the rules against insults and personal attacks are going to be unforced by me-others are under my protection and will get fair treatment-I owe that to God not to those who will not keep their agreement and abide by the rules.
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: February 25, 2006 18:07
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] *********** To all list members-Moderator Comment***************

ftr, what does this mean?
 
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 16:40:32 -0500 "Dean Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

I plan on enforcing the rules of protection on TT against those who love ch[ao]s

Reply via email to