Why?  I am OK with this one
As for G's monologue, most of the time I bypass it, I don't make any effort to try and apprehend
a meaning; I figure if someone really wants to communicate they will use plainness of speech;
Gary is just doing his own thing, which is fine, especially since he has a cheering gallery, but he
certainly is not exalting Christ in it. If I wanted an English lesson I would go back to Paul D. Camp.
 
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 17:02:44 +0000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why not form your own list, Judy.   I would be interested in seeing just how that would work.  And you miss the point of G's monologue, altogether -- IMO.  Hint: it has to do with the possibility for a reply that leaves open the notion of true exchange  ----------  from G's perspective,  maybe there is a message to be gleaned from the very presence of syntax in this regard.  jd  .

From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Then I suggest that those of you who are titillated by this kind of thing take G with you and
form your own List because this is not only rude it is divisive and sectarian - Oh thou discerner
of sects ....  DM does not do this.  He works hard to try and communicate with others wherever
they are at - This is preferring one's brother/sister - in LOVE.  An alien concept to some.
 
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:26:30 +0000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It should be obvious why G does this. 
It is to some of us. 
 
jd
 
From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hey Iz; you and your husband are in the medical field. What do they say about ppl
who like to dialogue with themselves all the time like this?  I note none of these are questions
they are all answers.  What was the question?
 
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 22:21:08 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..e.g., "Take a guard..Go, make the tomb as secure as you know how" means that Pilate knew, implictly, that he never could 'wash his hands' of JC (who was, quite interestingly, apprehending him)
 
 
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 22:11:47 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..the difference betw her & Pilate is that his language, implicitly, his notion of having 'apprehended' JC, is suspect
 
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 21:41:10 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..in her psyche, the writer already knows the notion is suspect
 
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 21:28:55 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
myth (note the quotes)
 
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 21:51:52 -0600 "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

..  “apprehend”  Christ..

 ||

 
 
 
 
 
 

Reply via email to