[TruthTalk] Fw: Fw: understanding, believing, knowing, doing

[Lance Muir]

----- Original Message ----- From: David Peck To: 'Lance Muir' Sent: March 21, 2006 10:01 Subject: RE: Fw: understanding, believing, knowing, doing This seems dangerously close to analytic philosophy and you know how I feel about that I tried to call you yesterday, but you had already left. I will see if I can get a hold of you today.     -----Original Message----- From: Lance Muir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: March 21, 2006 9:44 AM To: David Peck Subject: Fw: Fw: understanding, believing, knowing, doing     ----- Original Message ----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: March 21, 2006 09:40 Subject: Re: Fw: understanding, believing, knowing, doing   *how/do some understand what not to believe*   (therefore, (e.g.~) "to understand : to [not] believe : : to know : to [not] do") ?     On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 07:05:32 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:   ----- Original Message ----- From: Debbie Sawczak To: 'Lance Muir' Sent: March 20, 2006 18:44 Subject: understanding, believing, knowing, doing   * [one] can understand something without believing it or assenting to it. * || 2. Then..the notion that only those who do something can be said to know it in any meaningful sense.. seems to contradict what is said in (1) above.   That's true if we can make the following analogy.   to understand : to believe : : to know : to do   I don't think I can. I have little problem with making the terms 'believe' and 'do' analogous.