On 05 Jun 14:46, Christophe (net) wrote: > Le 05/06/2015 12:41, Cédric Krier a écrit : > >On 05 Jun 09:14, Christophe (net) wrote: > >>Hello > >> > >>We have written a little module that modifies the use of parties and > >>addresses for : > >> > >> - Adding of the possibility to define a default address on party (this > >>address does not need to show the name field) > > > >But there is already a default address on party (the first one). > > this module removes the ambiguity (nothing differentiates the first address > of the other if not its position) and especially specifies that the other > person addresses are identical to the primary address.
Ordering for prioritisation is one of the biggest design principal of Tryton. If you don't accept it, you will have to write a lot of modules because it is everywhere. > >> - Adding the association between contact mechanism and addresses (on an > >>idea of Zikzakmedia) > > > >I don't see the point to link for example an email to an address ? > > Not necessarily has an address but a person (name) who may have a different > address or not the main address. A person is a party not a contact mechanism. > >> - Help define the address of a contact is identical to the default > >> address > >>of the party to avoid having to re-enter informations. > >> > > > >Are not you trying to reimplement the party_relationship module? > > Not the relationship between the party, but the relationship between the > names, addresses and contacts mecanisms. What names? And there are no relation between addresses and contact mechanisms. -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
