On 2010/01/11 19:46:40, Ian Wilson wrote:
On 2010/01/11 17:30:03, ced wrote: > Ok for me The chain function looks very interesting but it seems to take about
the same
time as += but now the database times have far surpassed the list
operations in
time. Everything in the loop including += part of the code but
excluding the
calls to search takes about .001 seconds where as the calls to search
takes
about 5 to 6 seconds.
As soon as the memory allocation cost low, there will be no visible improvement I think. http://codereview.appspot.com/184065
-- [email protected] mailing list
