On 24/05/10 19:46 +0200, Udo Spallek wrote: > On 2010/05/24 11:56:17, ced wrote: > > On 2010/05/24 11:36:21, paepke wrote: > >> On 2010/05/24 10:54:09, ced wrote: > >>> On 2010/05/24 10:50:42, paepke wrote: > >>>> What does it mean "like a client"? What is the difference to using > netrpc? > >>> netrpc is just a protocol. > >>> "like a client" means like tryton. > >> how does tryton it? i don't understand the concept of this library. or for > >> what is is good for. > > My main goals is to be able make write test scenario at business level. > > A busines level testing API sounds very interesting to me. Some questions > remains: > > Can you give a more concrete examples for the later use?
Not for now. It is possible to read and write/create records. So not soo much than it can be done by direct rpc call. > Will proteus be able > to evaluate field contents delivered from trytond like the tryton client? I don't understand. > I have > already seen test_model and test_config, but these are not on 'business > level'. It is unittest of the library. > Do you mean with 'business level' tests which targets the direction I started > with http://codereview.appspot.com/818046 ? It will allow to write scripts that behaves like the client. > Are you planning to use some BDD-like higher level API ? I have no interest in this concept. > Makes Proteus a GUI testing framework (like dogtail) unnecessary ? (I guess > not) No. > For the moment it is hard to review proteus for me, I even can not say 'looks > good' > because I don't know the exactly targets of proteus. For now, we need only codereview and ideas to add features. And if someone can write XML-RPC backend, it will be great. -- Cédric Krier B2CK SPRL Rue de Rotterdam, 4 4000 Liège Belgium Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpFKeKWgBNok.pgp
Description: PGP signature
