On 20/09/10 08:50 -0700, Eric Klaasse wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for your reply. But I don't agree because of the following: > > A purchaser should not be able to change customers, or the other way > around. From the point of view of segregation of functions within a > organisation this is not acceptable.
I don't understand. What should not be changeable? > Selling to employees could be a nice feature, but not by default. > There is a high risk of fraud when it is that easy to sell products to > yourself or colleagues. How? Which fraud as there are records and logs? > Within sales orders just parties should be possible which are > authorized by the sales department for sales orders. Authorizing also > means a valid credit check, which is the main reason to prevent > selling to everybody. This are custom rules because it is based on entreprise policies. > Of course in a B2C environment where orders are > paid in advance this is not an issue. > The same goes for purchase > orders and suppliers. I don't understand. > I would like to see a distinction between Suppliers and Customers, > because there are different parameters possible for these entities. Which ones? As I said you can indentify suppliers because their are defined as supplier of at least one product. But having this by default will make the system harder to configure for simple/small business. By default, Tryton should have the less possible constraint because it is easy to add constraint but too complicate to remove them. > This could be done by the same way this has been done for Companies > and Employees (extra table). > > Again for segregation of functions I believe there should be a > different program available for each entity of parties. I don't understand. -- Cédric Krier B2CK SPRL Rue de Rotterdam, 4 4000 Liège Belgium Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Email/Jabber: [email protected] Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpLdJhKnn1Kf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
