On 14/10/10 09:20 -0700, newnomad wrote: > > > On Oct 13, 3:59 pm, Bertrand Chenal <bertrand.che...@b2ck.com> wrote: > > Le Wed, 13 Oct 2010 06:24:46 -0700 (PDT), > > newnomad <uti...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > > I believe it is possible to run tryton as a django module, does this > > > mean it would be possible to run tryton (via django patch) on Google > > > App Engine? Is tryton build in a way that would allow it to work with > > > bigtable rather then relational databases? or are there other problems > > > that would stand in the way of a GAE port? > > > Would it be easy, hard or impossible to achieve this? > > > > It would be pretty hard, Tryton is build to run on top of a relational > > DB, so porting Tryton to GAE would mean to re-write a big part of the > > core + some modules. And probably this rewriting will brings some api > > change, and thus trigger refactoring of modules. > > Would a rewrite to make use of light framework with an extra DB layer > (relational OR nosql), like http://web2pyslices.com/main/slices/take_slice/16 > , be justified and be less work?...
This is not the query syntax the issue. It is the way you store the data with or without relation. Tryton as a business software framework is based on some requirement for the DBMS like: - serialized transaction - foreign keys constraint - primary keys constraint Without this we can not garantee per example the numbering of invoice. I don't know what is your goals with this but I think perhaps a framework directly based on GAE will be better. -- Cédric Krier B2CK SPRL Rue de Rotterdam, 4 4000 Liège Belgium Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpuEMBHCRFTx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
