On 01/12/10 10:07 +0100, Paul J Stevens wrote: > On 12/01/2010 09:40 AM, "Cédric Krier" <[email protected]>" wrote: > > On 01/12/10 00:10 -0800, Mohammad wrote: > >> Maybe it is time for me to migrate to this Poteus , A client library > >> to work with ORM. > > > > Be careful that with Proteus you don't have access to the management of the > > DB > > transaction. So after each call, the transaction is commited as it will be > > from the client. > > Wasn't adding transaction management to proteus on your todo or r&d list?
I don't think. Because this could be added only to trytond but not to xml-rpc. So this will break the independency of the communication protocol. What I recently thought about with the Active-Record pattern switch, we could get a mode under which record (browse) will behave like in the client (with on_change call etc.). -- Cédric Krier B2CK SPRL Rue de Rotterdam, 4 4000 Liège Belgium Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Email/Jabber: [email protected] Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpMDDnVK1d6G.pgp
Description: PGP signature
