On 02/06/11 10:57 +0200, Nicolas Évrard wrote: > * [email protected] [2011-06-02 02:58 +0200]: > > Hello, > > This patch removes the need for python code in the workflow definition > by using function "name mangling" to infer which function to call. The > chosen function will then receive the browse record of the object > involved. > > Now I wonder, should I also use this principle for test in the > transitions ? What are your thoughts about this ?
Yes. We must remove as much as possible Python code from the XML because it makes this code impossible to override. -- Cédric Krier B2CK SPRL Rue de Rotterdam, 4 4000 Liège Belgium Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Email/Jabber: [email protected] Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpf1ImO6Deas.pgp
Description: PGP signature
