On 26/01/12 13:26 +0100, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote: > A Dijous, 26 de gener de 2012 13:24:44, Cédric Krier va escriure: > > > I agree that caching per location and per lot is not a good idea. > > > > > > So, new proposal: > > > > > > > > > a naive product_by_lot function will be slow, so we need caching. As > > > lots are a bit like temporary locations, > > > > If so, why not use location instead of lot? > > Because you can have several products with different lots in the same > location > :)
This is not an answer. If you consider that a lot is like a temporary location than you can not put different lots in the same location. -- Cédric Krier B2CK SPRL Rue de Rotterdam, 4 4000 Liège Belgium Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Email/Jabber: [email protected] Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpg3crj5FWC7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
