Am 22.03.2012 22:45, schrieb Cédric Krier:
On 22/03/12 22:39 +0100, Jan Grasnick | grasbauer ug wrote:
Yes, I know. I only was thinking about the posibilities of a
extension like field.on_transition_xxx(pyson)
Could you develop a little bit more, with an example of what will
contain on_transition_xxx etc.
Cedk, could be that I'm wrong with my thoughts. I was thinking about a
solution to evaluate the consistence of the xxx2xxx-fields if something
changes in the parent-model. Currently you can change the parent without
having angry childs, because the pyson of the childs don't know about
the state of the parent until the records are reloaded.
Am I right?
--
[email protected] mailing list
