El 08/11/12 08:26, Guillem Barba Domingo escribió:
2012/11/7 Cédric Krier <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
On 30/10/12 12:58 +0100, Cédric Krier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I already talked about this topic but here I got a first example
what we
> are going to face when the number of modules will increase [1].
> It is clear that prepends "trytond_" to the module name makes it
looks
> like an official Tryton module.
After some thoughts, I think I got a clear picture on how we can fix
this.
First, let clarify the two concepts here:
- package name: it is the name of the package, the archive that
contains the source code. It is this name that is exposed on
PyPI.
- module name: it is the name of the module under the directory
"trytond/modules" or in the entry points "trytond.modules"
As you can see, there is no requirement that both are the same. It is
what we did for the official Tryton modules, package names are
prefixed
with "trytond_".
What I propose is that non-official modules use an other prefix than
"trytond_" to not confuse people. The prefix could be the company
name,
the author name or whatever you like. But you can still use a
non-prefixed name for the module.
Let take an example:
* trytond_sale_kit: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/trytond_sale_kit
It could have a package name: "nantic_sale_kit"
And still have the module name: "sale_kit"
This means that if one day this module become official it is just
about
rename the package into trytond_sale_kit but not the module. So
for the
user who install it, it just need to rename the package.
Moreover, we can manage at the package level dependencies for a
specific
flavor of a tryton module. For example, if there are a friendly
fork :-)
of sale_kit by B2CK like b2ck_sale_kit. Other can put in their
setup.py
that they depend on the b2ck_sale_kit flavor instead of
nantic_sale_kit.
I think it's a good solution.
The use of company name prefix in package also reduces the colision
between package names.
--
I am not agree because the "nantic_sale_kit" for example it doesn't let
to find in the web how Tryton module, and because the name isn't related
with Tryton, but the bottom, yes it is, I think that the name the no
official packages must to say something about tryton because else it
seems anything, I propose something like that for packages name:
untryton_sale_kit ---> Unofficial Tryton Sale Kit Module
by NanTic
or
nontryton_crm ---> Non official Tryton CRM module by
Presik
So it is my point of view :)
Guillem Barba
http://www.guillem.alcarrer.net
--
[email protected] mailing list
--
Atentamente / Best Regards,
Oscar Andres Alvarez Montero
*Jefe de I+D / R&D Manager*
Productos La Victoria
www.productoslavictoria.com.co
Bucaramanga
"...Send from my Ubuntu Desktop"
--
[email protected] mailing list
