On 30/04/13 07:23 -0700, Marc Rechté wrote: > > > > > I'd say accounting in Tryton is better than in OpenERP: > > You misunderstood me, I did not intend to compare the functional aspect of > the two products. OpenERP may have more real case implementations than > Tryton and therefore is faced with practical considerations like > performance and simplicity of SQL. Have you checked the SQL implication of > such move.period.fiscalyear.company clause ? This would be acceptable in a > few queries, but company filtering is necessary in most accesses to data. > Writing a module or a report should be made as simple as possible (RAD), > denormalizing would help I think.
There is no performance degradation on such queries (except if you run Tryton since centuries). I start to doubt arguments about "simplicity of SQL". SQL is a programming language, it is intended to be used by developpers who know it. -- Cédric Krier B2CK SPRL Rue de Rotterdam, 4 4000 Liège Belgium Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Email/Jabber: [email protected] Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpWXJ30GE0S5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
