On 04/09/13 19:37 +0200, Jordi Esteve (Zikzakmedia) wrote: > Al 04/09/13 18:02, En/na Cédric Krier ha escrit: > >On 04/09/13 15:31 +0200, Jesús Martín Jiménez wrote: > >>This is the other way around. In provider invoices you can set its bank > >>account to pay him because he can ask you to pay in one specific account. > >>In this case, you can have the default one, and if the provider ask you to > >>pay in another bank account, you could change it. > >And I think it is better to have just a default value guess from > >previous invoices than having to configure/manage it explicitly. > >Because at the end, you still have to check it for every invoices you > >receive because supplier will not warn you if he changes. > > I don't agree: > > 1) In the business area I know, normally the supplier warns you if he > changes the bank account where he wants to receive the payment, > because the supplier changes its default bank account rarely and > warns you to prevent mistakes. > > 2) It's better to store a default bank account for the supplier than > guess it from the last previous invoice. Sometimes a supplier asks > you to change the bank account for only one invoice as an exceptional > case, the default bank account does not change and it is the correct > one for the following invoices. > > 3) It is the same solution used for the payment terms, a party has a > supplier (and customer) default payment term, but it could be changed > in an invoice if it is necessary.
Default payment term for supplier is also wrong and should not have been taken from OE. -- Cédric Krier B2CK SPRL Rue de Rotterdam, 4 4000 Liège Belgium Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Email/Jabber: [email protected] Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpsICBhgxB7Q.pgp
Description: PGP signature
