On 16/12/13 08:00 -0800, Josias Pérez wrote: > On Monday, December 16, 2013 9:45:52 AM UTC-6, Cédric Krier wrote: > > > > On 15/12/13 19:33 -0800, Josias Pérez wrote: > > > How > > > control inherits in records to another models to prevent that message? > > > > I don't understand the question. > > > > Any way, record rules are very complex to manage, you should really have > > a good point to use them. And I really don't see why you should add such > > rule to party because party reflect the external world which is readable > > by everyone. > > > > We have differents types of clients, but, when the user can see only this > own records types, specially in parties, invoices and sales. Let me know if > the question its more clear. Its a very important thing to have control on > what information can read every type of user.
Ha the control freaks! party is such a central point in the database structure that preventing reading it will lead you to a dead end. If you really don't want to share parties, it is better to use a database per restricted set of parties. -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: [email protected] Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpkRLdVrlQxv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
