On 07 Jan 17:42, Sergi Almacellas Abellana wrote: > El 07/01/14 16:37, Cédric Krier ha escrit: > >On 07 Jan 16:18, Sergi Almacellas Abellana wrote: > >>>El 07/01/14 12:59, Cédric Krier ha escrit: > >>>> >It should behave the same way as the purchase date on purchase. > >>>On purchase lines the date is managed via on change, and in shipments > >>>planned date is managed on write (all moves are updated). So why not > >>>using the same logic as planned date? > >Because planned is different of effective. effective date should never > >be changed once set. > And when changing the effective date on a shipment, all the moves > (that don't have and effective date set) must be updated with the > effective date. Don't they?
I don't think. effective date on move should stay managed by the system and not the user. It is just the effective date of the shipment that should be the default value for the effective date of the moves when they are assigned or done. > Changing effective date of the move must not be changed allowed from > the move if the shipment is set. Must they? They must be never changed. -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: [email protected] Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgp6jcnWCA6dz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
