On 08 Apr 12:16:14 UTC+2, Cédric Krier wrote: > > On 08 Apr 00:17, fern...@lgdmh.com <javascript:> wrote: > > Do you have any insight about this whole client functional testing > thing? > > For me, it is really not a priority because as you already said the > behavior is already tested using proteus and tryton as already some > tested for the most complex part. >
It makes sense. > Moreover, I really doubt that such tests will be of any help because the > current missing testing part is the human interaction and I doubt any > test which is not performed by human will help there. > Also, you should know the the client code is a very small part of the > all code of Tryton (about less than 5%) and that almost all the code is > run when you preform any simple business workflow. > Finally, you should know that the major number of bug reported on the > client are to improve the behavior and not really regressions. > Thank you for the info, I see that automatic gui testing would not provide in tryton all the benefits that I expected. Regards, Fernando > > -- > Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL > Email/Jabber: cedric...@b2ck.com <javascript:> > Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 > Website: http://www.b2ck.com/ >
